Amazon’s New MCF Preferred Pricing: What It Really Means for Brands - and Why 3PLs Still Matter More Than Ever
- Ahmad Zubi Noory

- 4 days ago
- 4 min read

Amazon recently announced MCF Preferred Pricing, launching January 15, 2026 - a new incentive program offering up to 15% off Multi-Channel Fulfillment fees and up to $1 per unit in FBA credits for eligible sellers.
On the surface, this sounds compelling. Lower fulfillment costs. A single inventory pool. Amazon shipping non-Amazon orders efficiently.
But as someone who operates a 3PL and works daily with brands scaling across Amazon, DTC, Walmart, and wholesale, I want to unpack what this move actually represents, what Amazon is optimizing for, and - most importantly - why brands that over-rely on MCF often regret it long-term.
This is not an anti-Amazon post. Amazon FBA and MCF absolutely have a place.
This is a strategy post.
What Amazon Is Really Doing With MCF Preferred Pricing
Let’s be clear: this is not a generosity play.
Amazon’s MCF Preferred Pricing is a volume-capture and ecosystem-lock-in strategy.
Amazon wants:
More off-Amazon orders (Shopify, TikTok Shop, Walmart, etc.) flowing through its network
More inventory permanently parked inside FBA
Fewer brands relying on independent warehouses for non-Amazon fulfillment
In short, Amazon is saying: “If you give us more of your business across all channels, we’ll subsidize the economics.”
This is smart strategy on their part - but brands need to understand the trade-offs.
Why MCF Looks Attractive (and Why Brands Are Tempted)
There’s no denying the appeal.
Amazon MCF offers:
A single inventory pool for FBA and MCF
Fast nationwide shipping
Unbranded packaging (now at no extra cost)
Reduced fulfillment fees under Preferred Pricing
Simplified operations for smaller teams
For early-stage or lean brands, MCF can absolutely be a useful tool.
But tools become traps when they’re misunderstood.
The Core Problem: Amazon Is Not a Neutral Fulfillment Partner
This is the most important point brands overlook.
Amazon is:
Your marketplace
Your competitor (private labels)
Your fee-setter
Your fulfillment provider
That concentration of power creates platform risk, even if the current pricing looks favorable.
Every incentive program Amazon has ever launched:
Has eligibility thresholds
Has terms that change
Can be rolled back or repriced
Prioritizes Amazon’s margins - not your business resilience
When brands route all fulfillment through Amazon, they trade short-term simplicity for long-term dependency.
Where Amazon MCF Breaks Down Operationally
From a real-world 3PL operator’s perspective, MCF still struggles in critical areas that matter as brands scale.
1. Lack of Operational Flexibility
Amazon MCF is rigid by design.
It does not handle well:
Custom kitting and bundles
Subscription box logic
Inserts, marketing materials, handwritten notes
Retail-ready prep for wholesale
EDI-driven B2B shipments
Channel-specific packaging rules
Brands that grow beyond “single SKU, single channel” quickly feel these constraints.
A real 3PL adapts to your business.
Amzon expects your business to adapt to Amazon.
2. Cost Predictability vs. Cost Control
Amazon offers price predictability today, not cost control tomorrow.
Fees change.
Storage policies change.
Placement fees change.
Credits disappear.
Independent 3PLs, by contrast:
Negotiate pricing transparently
Lock in contracts
Compete for your business
Cannot unilaterally change the rules
For serious brands, predictable relationships beat subsidized incentives.
3. Inventory Risk Concentration
MCF encourages brands to:
Hold more inventory in FBA
Reduce geographic redundancy
Centralize stock inside Amazon’s network
That increases exposure to:
Storage fee spikes
Long-term storage penalties
Stranded inventory
ASIN suppression
Inbound restrictions
Policy changes outside your control
A 3PL acts as a risk buffer, not just a fulfillment center.
The Strategic Role of 3PLs in 2026 and Beyond
The question is not “MCF or 3PL?”
The correct question is:
“What inventory belongs where - and why?”
Strong brands use both, intentionally.
What Amazon Is Best At
Fast Prime delivery
High-velocity SKUs
Amazon-native demand
Standardized fulfillment
What 3PLs Are Still Best At
DTC fulfillment with brand control
Walmart, TikTok, and marketplace nuance
Wholesale and B2B logistics
Overflow and long-term storage
Pre-FBA prep and rework
Inventory strategy - not just execution
The best brands use 3PLs as logistics partners, not vendors.
Why Smart Brands Will Not Fully Abandon 3PLs
Even with Preferred Pricing, experienced operators know:
Incentives expire
Volume thresholds rise
Margin pressure returns
Dependency reduces leverage
Brands that survive long-term:
Diversify fulfillment
Maintain optionality
Preserve negotiation power
Avoid single-point-of-failure logistics
A good 3PL is not cheaper than Amazon on paper.
A good 3PL is cheaper when things go wrong.
Final Thoughts: This Move Separates Operators From Optimizers
Amazon’s MCF Preferred Pricing will absolutely attract volume.
It will absolutely simplify operations for some sellers.
And it will absolutely pressure commodity 3PLs that offer nothing beyond pick-and-pack.
But for brands that care about:
Control
Resilience
Customization
Long-term scalability
Independent 3PLs remain not just relevant - but essential.
The future is not “Amazon vs. 3PL.”
The future is intentional hybrid fulfillment, led by strategy, not incentives.
If you’re a brand evaluating MCF Preferred Pricing and wondering how it fits into your fulfillment strategy, the right conversation isn’t “How do I save 15% this quarter?”
It’s:
“How do I build a fulfillment stack that won’t break when the rules change?”
That’s where the right 3PL still wins.




Comments